Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Counter Terrorism Israeli Style
While I was overseas in Afghanistan I read a book by Aaron Cohen entitled, Brotherhood of Warriors: Behind Enemy Lines with a Commando in one of the World’s Most Elite Counter terrorism Units. I didn't find it all that interesting and had I been in Canada I would have given up on it. However, things being what they were, namely bored paratrooper in Afghanistan, I read the thing from cover to cover. The only part I liked was the last chapter on counter terrorism techniques used in Israel. Israelis seem to have an ingrained sense of their own security and they are really quite successful in detecting and thwarting would-be jihadists. I have attached a couple of good articles from yesterday's National Post.
Airport security: Theatre of the absurd
Daniel Pipes, National Post Published: Monday, January 11, 2010
As hands are wrung in the aftermath of the near-tragedy on a Northwest Airlines flight approaching Detroit, a conversation from London's Heathrow airport in 1986 comes to mind.It consisted of an El Al security agent quizzing one Ann-Marie Doreen Murphy, a 32-year-old recent arrival in London from Sallynoggin, Ireland. While working as a chambermaid at the Hilton Hotel on Park Lane Murphy met Nizar al-Hindawi, a far-leftist Palestinian who impregnated her. After instructing her to "get rid of the thing," he abruptly changed his tune and insisted on immediate marriage in "the Holy Land." He also insisted on their traveling separately.Murphy, later described by the prosecutor as a "simple, unsophisticated Irish lass and a Catholic," accepted unquestioningly Hindawi's arrangements for her to fly to Israel on El Al on April 17. She also accepted a wheeled suitcase with a false bottom containing nearly two kilograms of Semtex, a powerful plastic explosive, and she agreed to be coached by him to answer questions posed by airport security.Murphy successfully passed through the standard Heathrow security inspection and reached the gate with her bag, where an El Al agent questioned her. As reconstructed by Neil C. Livingstone and David Halevy in Washingtonian magazine, he started by asking whether she had packed her bags herself. She replied in the negative. Then:"What is the purpose of your trip to Israel?" Recalling Hindawi's instructions, Murphy answered, "For a vacation.""Are you married, Miss Murphy?" "No.""Traveling alone?" "Yes.""Is this your first trip abroad?" "Yes.""Do you have relatives in Israel?" "No.""Are you going to meet someone in Israel?" "No."Has your vacation been planned for a long time?" "No.""Where will you stay while you're in Israel?" "The Tel Aviv Hilton.""How much money do you have with you?""Fifty pounds." The Hilton at that timecosting at least £70 a night, heasked:"Do you have a credit card?" "Oh, yes," she replied, showing him an i.d. for cashing cheques.That did it, and the agent sent her bag for additional inspection, where the bombing apparatus was discovered.Had El Al followed the usual Western security procedures, 375 ives would surely have been lost somewhere over Austria. The bombing plot came to light, in other words, through a non-technical intervention, relying on conversation, perception, common sense and (yes) profiling. The agent focused on the passenger, not the weaponry. Israeli counterterrorism takes passengers' identities into account; accordingly, Arabs endure an especially tough inspection. "In Israel, security comes first," David Harris of the American Jewish Committee explains.Obvious as this sounds, overconfidence, political correctness and legal liability render such an approach impossible anywhere else in the West. In the United States, for example, one month after 9/11, the Department of Transportation issued guidelines forbidding its personnel from generalizing "about the propensity of members of any racial, ethnic, religious, or national origin group to engage in unlawful activity." (Wear a hijab, I semi-jokingly advise women wanting to avoid secondary screening at airport security.)Worse yet, consider the panicky Mickey Mouse, and embarrassing steps the U.S. Transportation Security Administration implemented hours after the Detroit bombing attempt: no crew announcements "concerning flight path or position over cities or landmarks," and disabling all passenger communications services. During a flight's final hour, passengers may not stand up, access carry-on baggage or "have any blankets, pillows or personal belongings on the lap." Some crews went yet further, keeping cabin lights on throughout the night while turning off the in-flight entertainment, prohibiting all electronic devices and, during the final hour, requiring passengers to keep hands visible and neither eat nor drink. Things got so bad, the Associated Press reports, "A demand by one attendant that no one could read anything ... elicited gasps of disbelief and howls of laughter."Widely criticized for these Clouseau-like measures, TSA eventually decided to add "enhanced screening" for travellers passing through or originating from 14 "countries of interest" -- as though one's choice of departure airport indicates a propensity for suicide bombing.The TSA engages in "security theatre" --bumbling pretend-steps that treat all passengers equally rather than risk offending anyone by focusing, say, on religion. The alternative approach is Israelification, defined by a Canadian newspaper as "a system that protects life and limb without annoying you to death."Which do we want -- theatrics or safety?
If we want to take the security of our citizens safety we will have to stop worshiping at the altar of political correctness, as Israel seems to have done with great success.